Feast upon the Word Blog

A blog focused on LDS scriptures and teaching

Sunday School Lesson #35

Posted by Jim F. on September 8, 2007

Lesson 35: 2 Corinthians


1 and 2 Corinthians are two of perhaps four letters that Paul wrote to the saints in Corinth. The first letter (referred to in 1 Cor 5:9-13) has not been preserved. 1 Corinthians is the second letter, written partially in response to reports of problems in Corinth and partially in response to questions that the Corinthians had written to ask Paul. As we can see in 1 Corinthians 16:3-6, when Paul wrote 1 Corinthians, he intended to visit Corinth later, and he promised to send Timothy to Corinth. Timothy may have been the messenger who carried 1 Corinthians to Corinth.

After writing and sending 1 Corinthians, Paul made a second trip to Corinth, but that visit was a difficult one, with bad feelings between Paul and the Corinthians. (1 Corinthians 2:1 refers to that visit.) After that tense visit, it seems that Paul wrote a third letter (no longer in existence) from Ephesus rather than go to Corinth again. (See 2 Corinthians 1:15 and 23.) This lost letter would have been quite critical of the Corinthians, but written in Paul’s anguish (2 Corinthians 2:4).

After writing the third (hypothetical and missing) letter, Paul left Ephesus for Troas and continued on to Macedonia, where he met Titus. Titus brought news that the Corinthians had repented and were reconciled to Paul (2 Corinthians 7:5-13), and Paul wrote 2 Corinthians in response. Thus, 2 Corinthians seems to be the fourth letter in the series, written after Paul learned of the Corinthians’ repentance. Paul sent Titus back to Corinth with the letter that we call 2 Corinthians, a letter that included instructions for raising money to aid the Jewish Christians in Jerusalem (2 Corinthians 8:16-20).

There are three main parts to the letter:

2 Corinthians 1:12-7:16: Paul defends his relation to the Corinthians, explaining his anger, tears, and joy

2 Corinthians 8:1-9:15: He discusses the welfare collection being made for the Saints in Jerusalem

2 Corinthians 10:1-13:10: He confronts apostates within the Corinthian church, in particular some who think of themselves as “super-apostles” (“chief apostles” in the King James translation—11:5) teaching a new, supposedly superior, version of the Gospel. These “super-apostles” preach “another Jesus” than the one that Paul teaches (2 Corinthians 11:4). (Another interpretation is that people claiming the authority of the highest apostles in Jerusalem have come to Corinth and are preaching a different gospel than that which Paul taught.) As Paul plainly says, they are false apostles (2 Corintihans 11:13).   seem to have been a new kind of Judaizer: wealthy Palestinian Jewish converts, they insisted on reading the Old Testament only allegorically, they claimed special spiritual knowledge, they seem to have argued that Christ’s death made no difference to him because he was just as heavenly afterward as before, and they believed that wealth is proof of righteousness (and, so, denied that we must suffer and sacrifice).

Chapter 1

Verses 3-4: Given the circumstances in which the letter was written, why is it appropriate that Paul begin by praising Jesus as “the Father of mercies, and the God of all comfort” (verse 3)? What does the word “comfort” mean? How are mercy and comfort related? What reason does verse 4 give for Paul’s gratitude? What kind of comfort does Paul offer those who need comfort? How was Paul comforted by God? The words “comfort” and “consolation” in verses 3-7 all translate variations of the same word, “parakaleo.” Using the noun form of the word, Christ has used that word to describe both himself and the Holy Spirit, “the paraclete.” (See John 14:16; see also 1 John 2:1.) The word means not just “comforter,” though that translation is meaningful and important, but “one who stands beside another,” “an advocate for another.” Does that understanding of the word change your understanding of these verses? What does the promise of a comforter mean to us when we are suffering?

Verses 5-7: What does Paul mean when he says “the sufferings of Christ abound in us” (verse 5)? Might we reasonably understand this to mean “the sufferings for Christ”? We live in a time that is relatively free from persecution. What might it mean to suffer for Christ today? Can we do so in our personal relations, such as those with our family, ward, or community members? Here is another translation of verse 6: “If we suffer, it is for your help and salvation; if we are helped, then you too are helped and given the strength to endure with patience the same sufferings that we also endure.” What is Paul saying when he says that if he suffers, it is to help the Corinthians? What does he mean when he says that if he is helped, then they too are helped? Do we see anything like this in our own relations? In verse 7 Paul tells the Corinthians that he has a steadfast hope for them because he knows something. What does he know? How does that knowledge yield hope? Hope for what?

Chapter 4

Verses 1-2: In verse 1, Paul says that he has received his ministry, his calling, through God’s mercy. What does he mean by that? Are our callings given to us by divine mercy? How does having received his calling by God’s mercy make it possible for him to be strong? What might the “hidden things of dishonesty [or shame]” (verse 2) be? “Craftiness” is the same word translated “beguiled” in chapter 11, verse 3. What is Paul talking about? What does it mean to use the word of God deceitfully, in other words, to falsify it? How might we do so? What does it mean to commend oneself to the conscience or awareness of men in the sight of God?

Verses 3-6: Who are “them that are lost” (verse 3)? Why is the gospel hidden from them? Does it mean that they should not be proselytized? How does Paul explain their loss (verse 4)? Why does Paul think that he must remind the Corinthians that he is not preaching himself (verse 5)? What does he mean when he says that he preaches himself a servant for Jesus’ sake? Paul begins verse 6 with a reference to the creation. Why does he use that reference to speak of his conversion? In whose face did the Jews see the glory of God (Exodus 39:29-33)? In whose face did Paul, like other Christians, see that glory?

Verses 7-12: Who is the earthen vessel, the clay pot, in which a revelation of Jesus Christ has occurred? How does that revelation show “the excellency of the power of God, and not of us” (verse 7)? The word translated “troubled” (verse 8) means “confined, narrowed.” How is that a good description of what it means to be troubled? The word translated “distressed” means “cramped.” The word translated “perplexed” means “to have no way out.” What does “despair” mean? Why doesn’t Paul despair? Does that say anything about our despair? Why is it important for Paul to remind the Corinthians that he has been persecuted (verse 9)? Are any of them, perhaps, among the persecutors? What does it mean to be cast down (struck down)? In verse 10 Paul says that he always carries the death of Jesus in his own body. What does that mean? How is Jesus’ death revealed in Paul’s body? The word “for” at the beginning of verse 11 tells us that this verse explains what Paul has just said. What is the explanation? “Delivered unto” might be translated as “are in danger of.” Does that help your understanding of the verse? How was the life of Jesus revealed in Paul’s body? How is it revealed in ours? Given what Paul has just said in verses 10-11, can you explain what he means in verse 12?

Verses 13-15: In verse 13 Paul quotes from the Greek translation of the Old Testament (the version that he and most of those to whom he wrote would have used), Psalms 116:10: “I believed, and therefore have I spoken.” What point is Paul making by quoting that scripture? In verse 14 Paul tells what he believes, in other words, what he was referring to in verse 13. What does he believe and how is that relevant to the discussion? How would you describe the topic that Paul has been discussing? Is it announced in verses 1-2? In verses 8-11? Something else? Are the topics of those two passages different or the same? In verse 15 the King James translators inserted the word “are” after “all things.” (The italics mean that they inserted it; it was not part of the Greek text they were translating.) They thought that would make more sense of the verse. But I think the verse means “All these things are for your sakes, so that the abundant grace . . . .” If I am right, what is Paul saying in this verse? For whose glory does he work? How do “his” converts fit into that purpose?

Verses 16-18: Paul says “this” is the reason that he doesn’t lose strength? What is “this”? What does “outward man” refer to? How about “inward man”? The word “perished” might literally be translated “is being corrupted” and the word “renewed” might literally be translated “is being renewed or reinvigorated.” What causes the outward person to perish? What reinvigorates the inward person? In chapter 11 (verses 23-27) Paul describes some of the afflictions that he suffered: beatings and stonings, imprisonment, shipwreck and being lost at sea, the many great dangers of travel in those days, weariness, pain, sleeplessness, hunger and thirst, cold and nakedness. How can he describe his affliction as “light” (verse 17)? Why does Paul describe eternal glory as a weight? In verse 18, what are “the things which are seen” and the things which are not seen”? What does this verse have to do with the previous discussion?

Elder Neal Maxwell said: “When we take Jesus’ yoke upon us, this admits us eventually to what Paul called ‘the fellowship of [Christ’s] sufferings’ (Philippians 3:10). Whether illness or aloneness, injustice or rejection, . . . our comparatively small-scale sufferings, if we are meek, will sink into the very marrow of the soul. We then better appreciate not only Jesus’ sufferings for us, but also His matchless character, moving us to greater adoration and even emulation.”

What does it mean to take Jesus’ yoke on ourselves? How is suffering related to doing so? According to Elder Maxwell, what is the effect of suffering meekly? Why is adoration important? What would suffering bring us to emulate?

10 Responses to “Sunday School Lesson #35”

  1. RuthS said

    I have always felt that Christ’s yoke was not one of suffering as much as it is one of service. Clearly we cannot adquately pay for our own sins. If we could there would be little need for the atonement. By taking up Christ’s burden: the burden of helping others we then forget ourselves and our own burdens become lighter. I like to think of the human yoke. This is an implement that makes it easier for a person to carry a load because it distributes the weight evenly. This distribution not only makes the burden easier to carry it makes it possible to cary a larger load. Another kind of yoke that I think of when I think of the Savoior’s yoke being soft is the yoke of a shirt. It holds the shirt together at the shoulders and yet it is soft and easy to wear. Most recently I read a book called Walking The Bible. It is written by a journalist and is not a scholarly book. Yet it is most interesting. This author points out that stiffneckness refers to an ox that is unwilling to bend in order to be yoked to a cart.

    Emulating Christ has more to do with following his example of careing for the sick, the poor, the widows (what about single parents in general) and the fatherless than it is our own suffering. It is being filled with charity. In fact I think we generally dwell to much on suffereing especially our own.

  2. Jim, I’m wondering where you learned about the “‘super-apostles’ seem to have been a new kind of Judaizer:?” I thought these people were simply the same old Judaizers promoting the strict observance of the Mosaic Law. Please help me here with your understanding. Thanks!

  3. Jim, you skipped chapter 3 but I wonder about the mention of the veil (vail) here (v. 12-16). What, in your opinion or that of any G.A., was the purpose of this veil? I’m reading in other commentary that is was to protect Israel from the premature judgement of God, basically before they were ready for that judgement to come upon them. If this is so, is this the purpose for veils elsewhere in old & new scripture/church?–nanette

  4. RuthS & Jim, I appreciate your comment & post re: yoke but I don’t see Paul’s reference to it in 2 Cor. 6:14 being in this context, but rather regarding a believer being MARRIED to an unbeliever. The LDS footnotes likewise link this word “yoked” to interfaith marriage. Since Paul was speaking to this mixed group of people I think this more appropriately applies than “being yoked with Christ” or taking upon ourselves “Christ’s yoke.” Perhaps you can extrapolate to that context, but textually, I don’t think it’s appropriate.

  5. Jim F. said

    Ponderpaths: For a good review of the different interpretation used in thinking about who these super-apostles or chief apostles might have been, see the Word Biblicam Comment (vol. 40). Textually there are some hints. Verse 4 warns against those who teach another Jesus and another gospel, one that is not simple (verse 3). That introduces the reference to the super-apostles, but it doesn’t seem to describe those who believe that Christians must observe the Law of Moses strictly. (For me verse 13 makes clear that he cannot be talking about the Apostles of the Church, for he calls the people he is speaking of false apostles. It is also telling, I think, that Paul does not criticize them for teaching a gospel of works, which would seem the natural argument for Paul to use if he is dealing with those who are teaching the same message that other Judaizers taught. So, these are false apostles who teach “another” Jesus. (Was it the Jesus of some kind of proto-Gnosticism? Perhaps, but I don’t think we know.)

    However, looking back I can’t find the argument that, at the time, I thought made a reasonably good case for these being converts from Palestine claiming special knowledge. So, I’ve truck through that and revised it a bit.

  6. Jim F. said

    Nanette, I’ve not thought much about the veil that Moses put over his face to protect the children of Israel from the glory of God as it shown in his face (Exodus 34:30-34). As Paul often does, he interprets that veil allegorically (which is not to say that he didn’t believe there was a literal veil, only that the literal veil also has allegorical significance). I think it would be interesting to pursue the question of what veils mean in scripture and liturgy, but I’ve not made that pursuit yet myself.

    I agree with you that the yoke of which Paul speaks in 2 Corinthians 6:14 is the bond of marriage, not the yoke of discipleship. I intended the quotation from Elder Maxwell to be part of the discussion of 2 Corinthians 4:16-18, where Paul describes some of his sufferings.

  7. cherylem said

    Regarding 2 Cor. 6:14, I actually do NOT think this refers to marriage. For one thing, marriage is not at all referenced in this passage and is not compelled by the context. Rather, the “unbelievers” are most likely Paul’s enemies, or followers of the “old religion” generally, or even the “superapostles.” i.e., as footnoted in the Harper Collins NSRV: “the passage functions to insist that full reconciliation with Paul entails a renunciation of the church’s relationshp with his rivals.” NIV footnotes as follows: “For the Corinthian believers to cooperate with false teachers, who are in reality servants of Satan, notwithstanding their charming and persuasive ways (11:13-14), is to become unequally yoked, destroying the harmony and fellowship that unite them in Christ.”

    Also, my own reading of v. 16 refers this verse to a theology of idols: “What agreement is there between the temple of God and idols?” One gets the idea that the Corinthians have one foot in the Christian camp and one foot in the old ways. v. 17 continues: “Wherefore come out from among them, and be ye separate . . .”

    In this instance I believe the common LDS interpretation (and footnoting) of relating this to “interfaith” marriage is incorrect. It does not make sense in context for this to refer to marriage, and seems to me to be a very naive reading of the text.

  8. Jim F. said

    cherylem: Touché! I have to confess to not having paid much attention to the passage because I assumed it was about interfaith marriage. That assumption was one based on no more than what I have heard for many years, but it did cause me to read naively. Thanks for the help with the passage. I think your interpretation makes a lot more sense.

  9. s james said

    That the expression ‘unequally yoked’ is applied to interfaith marriage is not just an LDS rendering, but also an application made by many other Christian commentators…

    However, as Paul earlier advised the Corinthians:

    But to the rest speak I, not the Lord: If any brother hath a wife that believeth not, and she be pleased to dwell with him, let him not put her away.

    And the woman which hath an husband that believeth not, and if he be pleased to dwell with her, let her not leave him.

    For the unbelieving husband is sanctified by the wife, and the unbelieving wife is sanctified by the husband: else were your children unclean; but now are they holy.

    1 Cor 7:12-14

  10. cherylem said

    Really, not so many commentators as you would think (though there are some) refer this to interfaith marriage. And all of those that I found (maybe three) who refer this to marriage ALSO write more about the unequal yoking in this congregation to old and/or wrong beliefs, and give THAT yoking more weight.

    Additionally I do not think Paul was referring to interfaith marriage. This is another one of those “legacies” that have grown up over the centuries by reading Paul through a lens of “we already know what he means.” While I am not advocating interfaith marriage, I think it is important to clear the air here – both so that we can read this as Paul intended, and also to lighten the burdens of the faithful members of the church who are married to nonmembers, and who have had to wear this scripture like a millstone around their necks.

    Thanks for the 1 Corinthians reference. It was very helpful.

Sorry, the comment form is closed at this time.

%d bloggers like this: