Comments on: Opposition, 3 – The Traditional Interpretation of 2 Nephi 2:11 http://feastuponthewordblog.org/2012/09/26/opposition-3-the-traditional-interpretation-of-2-nephi-211/ A blog focused on LDS scriptures and teaching Wed, 22 May 2013 02:16:02 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.com/ By: Henrietta http://feastuponthewordblog.org/2012/09/26/opposition-3-the-traditional-interpretation-of-2-nephi-211/#comment-49384 Tue, 23 Apr 2013 04:59:01 +0000 http://feastuponthewordblog.org/?p=4073#comment-49384 I comment when I appreciate a post on a blog or if I have something to contribute to the discussion.

It is caused by the passion communicated in the article I browsed.
And on this article Opposition, 3 – The Traditional Interpretation of 2 Nephi 2:
11 « Feast upon the Word Blog. I was excited
enough to drop a leave a responsea response ;) I actually do have
2 questions for you if it’s allright. Is it simply me or does it look like some of these comments come across as if they are written by brain dead people? :-P And, if you are writing at additional sites, I would like to keep up with everything new you have to post. Could you make a list every one of your social pages like your twitter feed, Facebook page or linkedin profile?

]]> By: 2 Nephi 2:11 – Opposition! « Lehi's Discourse http://feastuponthewordblog.org/2012/09/26/opposition-3-the-traditional-interpretation-of-2-nephi-211/#comment-47427 Sun, 17 Feb 2013 14:51:49 +0000 http://feastuponthewordblog.org/?p=4073#comment-47427 [...] my three-part summary of the history of interpretation of this passage (in the twentieth century): here, here, and here. I’ve also dealt with some of the major translations of this passage into [...]

]]> By: Opposition, 8 – “Opposition” « Feast upon the Word Blog http://feastuponthewordblog.org/2012/09/26/opposition-3-the-traditional-interpretation-of-2-nephi-211/#comment-44844 Mon, 05 Nov 2012 14:12:27 +0000 http://feastuponthewordblog.org/?p=4073#comment-44844 [...] speaking, as we’ve seen, Latter-day Saints hear in Lehi’s words a use of either definition 3 or definition [...]

]]> By: Opposition, 4 – Early Philosophical Engagement with 2 Nephi 2:11 « Feast upon the Word Blog http://feastuponthewordblog.org/2012/09/26/opposition-3-the-traditional-interpretation-of-2-nephi-211/#comment-42759 Thu, 27 Sep 2012 14:32:27 +0000 http://feastuponthewordblog.org/?p=4073#comment-42759 [...] comments joespencer on Opposition, 3 – The Traditional Interpretation of 2 Nephi 2:11jacob on Opposition, 3 – The Traditional Interpretation of 2 Nephi 2:11rameumptom on [...]

]]> By: joespencer http://feastuponthewordblog.org/2012/09/26/opposition-3-the-traditional-interpretation-of-2-nephi-211/#comment-42749 Thu, 27 Sep 2012 01:52:22 +0000 http://feastuponthewordblog.org/?p=4073#comment-42749 Jacob – You might well guess I’ve got a few things up my sleeve here. The next post will address the history of philosophical interpretation of this passage, stretching from B. H. Roberts’ fascinating analysis to Dennis Potter’s very recent study. There’s much to say there. But in the posts that follow that, I’ll be going, I think, much further still….

]]> By: jacob http://feastuponthewordblog.org/2012/09/26/opposition-3-the-traditional-interpretation-of-2-nephi-211/#comment-42746 Wed, 26 Sep 2012 22:38:35 +0000 http://feastuponthewordblog.org/?p=4073#comment-42746 I almost hesitate to say this, but I always felt like these explanations/interpretations come off as somewhat trite. There is this nagging suspicion that we’re all missing a much larger idea when we instead focus on how these dichotomies supposedly “create” agency. So I’m really looking forward to the rest of your posts to see if there is an alternative perspective, especially in consideration of the phrase “it must needs be.” Keep up the good work!

]]> By: rameumptom http://feastuponthewordblog.org/2012/09/26/opposition-3-the-traditional-interpretation-of-2-nephi-211/#comment-42744 Wed, 26 Sep 2012 17:51:59 +0000 http://feastuponthewordblog.org/?p=4073#comment-42744 Very nice review of the standard understanding of the verse. I’m sure your next post will have CES heads spinning around. I look forward to reading it.

]]> By: Opposition, 0 – Series Introduction « Feast upon the Word Blog http://feastuponthewordblog.org/2012/09/26/opposition-3-the-traditional-interpretation-of-2-nephi-211/#comment-42739 Wed, 26 Sep 2012 13:28:03 +0000 http://feastuponthewordblog.org/?p=4073#comment-42739 [...] comments Opposition, 3 – The Traditional Interpretation of 2 Nephi 2:11 « Feast upon the Word Blo… on Opposition, 2 – Contextualizing 2 Nephi 2:11kirkcaudle on RS/MP Lesson 16: “Offer [...]

]]>