<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: OT Lesson 2 Study Notes: Abraham 3; Moses 4:1-4</title>
	<atom:link href="http://feastuponthewordblog.org/2009/12/21/ot-lesson-2-study-notes-abraham-3-moses-41-4/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://feastuponthewordblog.org/2009/12/21/ot-lesson-2-study-notes-abraham-3-moses-41-4/</link>
	<description>A blog focused on LDS scriptures and teaching</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 13 Feb 2012 13:55:41 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: jennywebb</title>
		<link>http://feastuponthewordblog.org/2009/12/21/ot-lesson-2-study-notes-abraham-3-moses-41-4/#comment-29802</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[jennywebb]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 11 Jan 2010 16:41:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://feastuponthewordblog.org/?p=1164#comment-29802</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Robert, I like your application to the overarching question. Any covenant emanating from a God with integrity would, necessarily, be similarly structured. Perhaps that&#039;s where v.18 is going when it provides a relationship between the stars and the spirits?]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Robert, I like your application to the overarching question. Any covenant emanating from a God with integrity would, necessarily, be similarly structured. Perhaps that&#8217;s where v.18 is going when it provides a relationship between the stars and the spirits?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: J. Madson</title>
		<link>http://feastuponthewordblog.org/2009/12/21/ot-lesson-2-study-notes-abraham-3-moses-41-4/#comment-29797</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[J. Madson]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 11 Jan 2010 08:43:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://feastuponthewordblog.org/?p=1164#comment-29797</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I personally think much of this relates to facsimile 3 and that the astronomy abraham is explaining is demonstrating that his God lives near the planet Kolob which encircles or controls, as the egyptian verb for a planets rotation would also mean, the bodies within its orbit. This would of course include the egyptian pantheon of gods.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I personally think much of this relates to facsimile 3 and that the astronomy abraham is explaining is demonstrating that his God lives near the planet Kolob which encircles or controls, as the egyptian verb for a planets rotation would also mean, the bodies within its orbit. This would of course include the egyptian pantheon of gods.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Robert C.</title>
		<link>http://feastuponthewordblog.org/2009/12/21/ot-lesson-2-study-notes-abraham-3-moses-41-4/#comment-29796</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Robert C.]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 11 Jan 2010 06:39:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://feastuponthewordblog.org/?p=1164#comment-29796</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I really appreciate the post and comments here. I really have a hard time making any sense of this chapter. In fact, it&#039;s Jim&#039;s very first question, before I even read it in Jim&#039;s notes, that has really been haunting me:

&lt;blockquote&gt;Verses 1-19: Why did the Lord reveal these things to Abraham? More important: why did he think it important to reveal them to us?&lt;/blockquote&gt;

Of course this could be asked about any passage of scripture, but it was esp. bothering me with regard to this chapter as I sat in Sunday school today, and it seemed we were floundering to understand the significance of any of this.

Is Jenny (#11) onto something here that can be applied to the whole chapter? God is providing Abraham with an analogy of the structural integrity of the universe as a metaphor for the structural integrity of the human family, or at least the covenantal family that Abraham will be the father of? 

Any comments in response will be much appreciated, this is one of those burning questions that&#039;s really eating at me (and it&#039;s related in so many ways to questions I have about the creation story and the temple...)!]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I really appreciate the post and comments here. I really have a hard time making any sense of this chapter. In fact, it&#8217;s Jim&#8217;s very first question, before I even read it in Jim&#8217;s notes, that has really been haunting me:</p>
<blockquote><p>Verses 1-19: Why did the Lord reveal these things to Abraham? More important: why did he think it important to reveal them to us?</p></blockquote>
<p>Of course this could be asked about any passage of scripture, but it was esp. bothering me with regard to this chapter as I sat in Sunday school today, and it seemed we were floundering to understand the significance of any of this.</p>
<p>Is Jenny (#11) onto something here that can be applied to the whole chapter? God is providing Abraham with an analogy of the structural integrity of the universe as a metaphor for the structural integrity of the human family, or at least the covenantal family that Abraham will be the father of? </p>
<p>Any comments in response will be much appreciated, this is one of those burning questions that&#8217;s really eating at me (and it&#8217;s related in so many ways to questions I have about the creation story and the temple&#8230;)!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: jennywebb</title>
		<link>http://feastuponthewordblog.org/2009/12/21/ot-lesson-2-study-notes-abraham-3-moses-41-4/#comment-29786</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[jennywebb]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 11 Jan 2010 00:01:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://feastuponthewordblog.org/?p=1164#comment-29786</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I was thinking about the question Jim poses for vs. 17 today in Sunday School. Jim asks &quot;Verse 17: What is the relation of the first part of this verse to the second? What is the second part telling us? Does it mean “God is arbitrary, doing whatever occurs to him” or does it say something about his character: “He does whatever his pure heart desires and we can trust him because of the purity of his heart”? Or does it say something else?&quot;

I wonder if the two segments of the sentence could be related in terms of integrity. That is, the integrity of God—his utter lack of deception, misdirection, forgetfulness, etc. and his complete commitment to any task he decides to accomplish—is reflected in the integrity of the structure of the universe. The complete order running throughout the universe (if two things exist, they will exist in an ordered relationship to each other) provides us with a sense of structural integrity (every part will fit into the whole following this logic, even if the parts are infinite). Therefore, as a response to Jim&#039;s formulation, the second half does reveal something about God&#039;s character (his integrity), but it reveals that integrity in the structured, ordered terms presented in the universe/al description of the first half.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I was thinking about the question Jim poses for vs. 17 today in Sunday School. Jim asks &#8220;Verse 17: What is the relation of the first part of this verse to the second? What is the second part telling us? Does it mean “God is arbitrary, doing whatever occurs to him” or does it say something about his character: “He does whatever his pure heart desires and we can trust him because of the purity of his heart”? Or does it say something else?&#8221;</p>
<p>I wonder if the two segments of the sentence could be related in terms of integrity. That is, the integrity of God—his utter lack of deception, misdirection, forgetfulness, etc. and his complete commitment to any task he decides to accomplish—is reflected in the integrity of the structure of the universe. The complete order running throughout the universe (if two things exist, they will exist in an ordered relationship to each other) provides us with a sense of structural integrity (every part will fit into the whole following this logic, even if the parts are infinite). Therefore, as a response to Jim&#8217;s formulation, the second half does reveal something about God&#8217;s character (his integrity), but it reveals that integrity in the structured, ordered terms presented in the universe/al description of the first half.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: garnet</title>
		<link>http://feastuponthewordblog.org/2009/12/21/ot-lesson-2-study-notes-abraham-3-moses-41-4/#comment-29763</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[garnet]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 10 Jan 2010 05:42:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://feastuponthewordblog.org/?p=1164#comment-29763</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&quot;Verses 5-8: Is the structure of these verses significant: verses 5 and 7 are parallel to one another, and verses 6 and 8 are parallel?&quot;

Doesn&#039;t this also extend through the chapter?  I think there is chiasmus through all of the verses 1-11.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;Verses 5-8: Is the structure of these verses significant: verses 5 and 7 are parallel to one another, and verses 6 and 8 are parallel?&#8221;</p>
<p>Doesn&#8217;t this also extend through the chapter?  I think there is chiasmus through all of the verses 1-11.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: KirkC</title>
		<link>http://feastuponthewordblog.org/2009/12/21/ot-lesson-2-study-notes-abraham-3-moses-41-4/#comment-29744</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[KirkC]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 09 Jan 2010 10:52:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://feastuponthewordblog.org/?p=1164#comment-29744</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Just to add to my last comment (#8), Abr. 3:15-21 is already talking about how intelligences differ from one another. 

On another interesting note, D&amp;C 138:53 describes the prophets as &quot;choice spirits.&quot; In v55, these choice spirits &quot;where also among the noble and great ones who were chosen in the beginning.&quot; The &quot;choice spirits&quot; of v53 again seem to differ from the &quot;noble and great ones&quot; who they were among.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Just to add to my last comment (#8), Abr. 3:15-21 is already talking about how intelligences differ from one another. </p>
<p>On another interesting note, D&amp;C 138:53 describes the prophets as &#8220;choice spirits.&#8221; In v55, these choice spirits &#8220;where also among the noble and great ones who were chosen in the beginning.&#8221; The &#8220;choice spirits&#8221; of v53 again seem to differ from the &#8220;noble and great ones&#8221; who they were among.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: KirkC</title>
		<link>http://feastuponthewordblog.org/2009/12/21/ot-lesson-2-study-notes-abraham-3-moses-41-4/#comment-29741</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[KirkC]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 09 Jan 2010 09:22:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://feastuponthewordblog.org/?p=1164#comment-29741</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Verse 23: To which intelligences does “these souls” refer to? What does it mean to be chosen before one is born?  In this verse does spirits mean the same as intelligences did in earlier verses? Why or why not?

I think this might have something to do with our spiritual progression at the time of the council. In v22, Abraham saw intelligences, &quot;and among those were many noble and great ones.&quot; However, in v23, the noble and great ones are referred to as &quot;souls.&quot; Therefore, I think these might be two different groups at differing times in their spiritual progression.

However, v23 also appears to possibly introduce a third group. v23, &quot;for he [God] stood [I think this is in addition to the &quot;souls&quot;] among those that were spirits.&quot; Abraham was a spirit. 

Souls and spirits are both &quot;noble and great ones,&quot; but spirits appear to be a step above the rest.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Verse 23: To which intelligences does “these souls” refer to? What does it mean to be chosen before one is born?  In this verse does spirits mean the same as intelligences did in earlier verses? Why or why not?</p>
<p>I think this might have something to do with our spiritual progression at the time of the council. In v22, Abraham saw intelligences, &#8220;and among those were many noble and great ones.&#8221; However, in v23, the noble and great ones are referred to as &#8220;souls.&#8221; Therefore, I think these might be two different groups at differing times in their spiritual progression.</p>
<p>However, v23 also appears to possibly introduce a third group. v23, &#8220;for he [God] stood [I think this is in addition to the "souls"] among those that were spirits.&#8221; Abraham was a spirit. </p>
<p>Souls and spirits are both &#8220;noble and great ones,&#8221; but spirits appear to be a step above the rest.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: KirkC</title>
		<link>http://feastuponthewordblog.org/2009/12/21/ot-lesson-2-study-notes-abraham-3-moses-41-4/#comment-29697</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[KirkC]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 07 Jan 2010 11:14:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://feastuponthewordblog.org/?p=1164#comment-29697</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[#2, MCR, I hate to even ask this question (because of the discussion on the other thread/lesson 1), but are you reading the text as Abraham talking with The Father? Your comments seem to imply so; I just want to make sure I understand where you are coming from.

I forgot to put in my above post that I recognize God touches the stones of the Brother of Jared in Ether 3, but I am unsure if he physically touches them, or simply appears to touch them when they light up. Just wanted to point that out.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>#2, MCR, I hate to even ask this question (because of the discussion on the other thread/lesson 1), but are you reading the text as Abraham talking with The Father? Your comments seem to imply so; I just want to make sure I understand where you are coming from.</p>
<p>I forgot to put in my above post that I recognize God touches the stones of the Brother of Jared in Ether 3, but I am unsure if he physically touches them, or simply appears to touch them when they light up. Just wanted to point that out.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: KirkC</title>
		<link>http://feastuponthewordblog.org/2009/12/21/ot-lesson-2-study-notes-abraham-3-moses-41-4/#comment-29696</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[KirkC]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 07 Jan 2010 11:04:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://feastuponthewordblog.org/?p=1164#comment-29696</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Verse 11: Here and in verses 12 and 21, the Lord speaks of the things his hands have made. The creation stories show the Father making things by his word, by commanding them to happen and being obeyed, rather than making them by his hands. Why do you think he uses the image of hands here? -Jim

Maybe to put emphasis on the Atonement? Isa. 49: 15-16

“Can a woman forget her sucking child, that she should not have compassion on the son of her womb? yea, they may forget, yet will I not forget thee. Behold, I have graven thee upon the palms of my hands; thy walls are continually before me.”

The obvious difference between Moses and Abraham is that God touches physically touches the latter.  In Abr. 3:12 God “put his hand upon {Abraham’s] eyes.” I am unsure of the usage of the word “hands” in this book, and this passage confuses me. Is it figurative or literal? We read in Ether 3:16 that God tells the Brother of Jared,” Behold, this body, which ye now behold, is the body of my spirit; and man have I created after the body of my spirit; and even as I appear unto thee to be in the spirit will I appear unto my people in the flesh.” Yet, God touches Abraham?    

If the word hand is figurative here, rather than literal, because God is a spirit, then that makes Jim’s question regarding v11 extremely interesting. If hands=atonement, maybe the knowledge of the atonement allows Abraham to see the coming “here am I, send me” scene?  However, that might be a stretch. I will have to think more on this.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Verse 11: Here and in verses 12 and 21, the Lord speaks of the things his hands have made. The creation stories show the Father making things by his word, by commanding them to happen and being obeyed, rather than making them by his hands. Why do you think he uses the image of hands here? -Jim</p>
<p>Maybe to put emphasis on the Atonement? Isa. 49: 15-16</p>
<p>“Can a woman forget her sucking child, that she should not have compassion on the son of her womb? yea, they may forget, yet will I not forget thee. Behold, I have graven thee upon the palms of my hands; thy walls are continually before me.”</p>
<p>The obvious difference between Moses and Abraham is that God touches physically touches the latter.  In Abr. 3:12 God “put his hand upon {Abraham’s] eyes.” I am unsure of the usage of the word “hands” in this book, and this passage confuses me. Is it figurative or literal? We read in Ether 3:16 that God tells the Brother of Jared,” Behold, this body, which ye now behold, is the body of my spirit; and man have I created after the body of my spirit; and even as I appear unto thee to be in the spirit will I appear unto my people in the flesh.” Yet, God touches Abraham?    </p>
<p>If the word hand is figurative here, rather than literal, because God is a spirit, then that makes Jim’s question regarding v11 extremely interesting. If hands=atonement, maybe the knowledge of the atonement allows Abraham to see the coming “here am I, send me” scene?  However, that might be a stretch. I will have to think more on this.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: KirkC</title>
		<link>http://feastuponthewordblog.org/2009/12/21/ot-lesson-2-study-notes-abraham-3-moses-41-4/#comment-29695</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[KirkC]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 07 Jan 2010 10:41:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://feastuponthewordblog.org/?p=1164#comment-29695</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Does anyone see any relation to the “stars” in v1-3 and D&amp;C 29:14 in relation to the last days?

&quot;But, behold, I say unto you that before this great day shall come the sun shall be darkened, and the moon shall be turned into blood, and the stars shall fall from heaven, and there shall be greater signs in heaven above and in the earth beneath.&quot;

We know one star had already fallen, Isa. 14:12 where Satan is the morning star. However, I am not sure if all three of these stars are related or not.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Does anyone see any relation to the “stars” in v1-3 and D&amp;C 29:14 in relation to the last days?</p>
<p>&#8220;But, behold, I say unto you that before this great day shall come the sun shall be darkened, and the moon shall be turned into blood, and the stars shall fall from heaven, and there shall be greater signs in heaven above and in the earth beneath.&#8221;</p>
<p>We know one star had already fallen, Isa. 14:12 where Satan is the morning star. However, I am not sure if all three of these stars are related or not.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Robert C.</title>
		<link>http://feastuponthewordblog.org/2009/12/21/ot-lesson-2-study-notes-abraham-3-moses-41-4/#comment-29658</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Robert C.]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 05 Jan 2010 04:04:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://feastuponthewordblog.org/?p=1164#comment-29658</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[CC #3, this is great, thanks for posting the link. I esp. like the possibilities you&#039;ve opened regarding Abraham 3:27, and the temple significance this reading highlights---I&#039;ve often wondered about this &quot;like unto the Son of Man&quot; phrase: 

&lt;blockquote&gt;[Abraham . . . as narrator] And the Lord [Jesus/Jehovah] said: [&quot;]Whom shall I send?[&quot;] [to be the first to experience the next estate] And one [Michael/Adam] answered &lt;i&gt;like&lt;/i&gt; unto the Son of Man [Jesus, Son of Man or Son of God]: [&quot;]Here am I, send me[&quot;]. And another [Lucifer] answered and said: [&quot;]Here am I, send me[&quot;]. And the Lord [Jesus] said: [&quot;]I will send the first.[&quot;]&lt;/blockquote&gt;]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>CC #3, this is great, thanks for posting the link. I esp. like the possibilities you&#8217;ve opened regarding Abraham 3:27, and the temple significance this reading highlights&#8212;I&#8217;ve often wondered about this &#8220;like unto the Son of Man&#8221; phrase: </p>
<blockquote><p>[Abraham . . . as narrator] And the Lord [Jesus/Jehovah] said: ["]Whom shall I send?["] [to be the first to experience the next estate] And one [Michael/Adam] answered <i>like</i> unto the Son of Man [Jesus, Son of Man or Son of God]: ["]Here am I, send me["]. And another [Lucifer] answered and said: ["]Here am I, send me["]. And the Lord [Jesus] said: ["]I will send the first.["]</p></blockquote>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Clean Cut</title>
		<link>http://feastuponthewordblog.org/2009/12/21/ot-lesson-2-study-notes-abraham-3-moses-41-4/#comment-29645</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Clean Cut]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 04 Jan 2010 15:57:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://feastuponthewordblog.org/?p=1164#comment-29645</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Just to add to the discussion, I think we might gain some new insight by challenging the manual linking Abraham 3:27 and Moses 4:1-2.  It seems obvious that in the Moses scripture it is Jesus Christ who says &quot;here am I, send me&quot; in reference to being the Savior.  But in the Abraham scripture it seems very possible that the &quot;one like unto the Son of Man&quot; is not the Son of Man himself, but one (Michael/Adam) answering like unto Jesus, saying &quot;here am I, send me&quot;.  This is not in reference to becoming the Savior, but perhaps rather in reference to beginning the &quot;second estate&quot;, or earth life.  In context, the verse directly preceding this discusses keeping the first and second estate.  

I think it&#039;s worth considering:

&quot;Reading Abraham 3:22-28 through new eyes&quot;
http://latterdayspence.blogspot.com/2009/12/reading-abraham-322-28-through-new-eyes.html]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Just to add to the discussion, I think we might gain some new insight by challenging the manual linking Abraham 3:27 and Moses 4:1-2.  It seems obvious that in the Moses scripture it is Jesus Christ who says &#8220;here am I, send me&#8221; in reference to being the Savior.  But in the Abraham scripture it seems very possible that the &#8220;one like unto the Son of Man&#8221; is not the Son of Man himself, but one (Michael/Adam) answering like unto Jesus, saying &#8220;here am I, send me&#8221;.  This is not in reference to becoming the Savior, but perhaps rather in reference to beginning the &#8220;second estate&#8221;, or earth life.  In context, the verse directly preceding this discusses keeping the first and second estate.  </p>
<p>I think it&#8217;s worth considering:</p>
<p>&#8220;Reading Abraham 3:22-28 through new eyes&#8221;<br />
<a href="http://latterdayspence.blogspot.com/2009/12/reading-abraham-322-28-through-new-eyes.html" rel="nofollow">http://latterdayspence.blogspot.com/2009/12/reading-abraham-322-28-through-new-eyes.html</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: MCR</title>
		<link>http://feastuponthewordblog.org/2009/12/21/ot-lesson-2-study-notes-abraham-3-moses-41-4/#comment-29635</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[MCR]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 04 Jan 2010 06:07:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://feastuponthewordblog.org/?p=1164#comment-29635</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Re: Verse 11 where you write, &quot;the Lord speaks of the things his hands have made. The creation stories show the Father making things by his word, by commanding them to happen and being obeyed, rather than making them by his hands. Why do you think he uses the image of hands here?&quot;

When the Father &#039;speaks of things his hands made&#039; and &#039;making things by his word&quot; perhaps He was referring to creating by his Only Begotten, as in John 1:1-3 (&quot;In the beginning was the Word....all things were made by him, and without him was not anything that was made&quot;) and Isaiah 48:10 (&quot;Mine hand also hath laid the foundation of the aearth, and my right hand hath spanned the heavens: when I call unto them, they stand up together&quot;)?  Is not His Only Begotten Son, his &#039;right hand&#039; or on his &#039;right hand&#039;?]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Re: Verse 11 where you write, &#8220;the Lord speaks of the things his hands have made. The creation stories show the Father making things by his word, by commanding them to happen and being obeyed, rather than making them by his hands. Why do you think he uses the image of hands here?&#8221;</p>
<p>When the Father &#8216;speaks of things his hands made&#8217; and &#8216;making things by his word&#8221; perhaps He was referring to creating by his Only Begotten, as in John 1:1-3 (&#8220;In the beginning was the Word&#8230;.all things were made by him, and without him was not anything that was made&#8221;) and Isaiah 48:10 (&#8220;Mine hand also hath laid the foundation of the aearth, and my right hand hath spanned the heavens: when I call unto them, they stand up together&#8221;)?  Is not His Only Begotten Son, his &#8216;right hand&#8217; or on his &#8216;right hand&#8217;?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: &#124; Times &#38; Seasons</title>
		<link>http://feastuponthewordblog.org/2009/12/21/ot-lesson-2-study-notes-abraham-3-moses-41-4/#comment-29577</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[&#124; Times &#38; Seasons]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 03 Jan 2010 03:50:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://feastuponthewordblog.org/?p=1164#comment-29577</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] on this post should be made at Feast Upon the Word   0 people like this post. [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] on this post should be made at Feast Upon the Word   0 people like this post. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

