If you’re just joining the discussion, this is Part Two. In Part One, we asked why Nephi and Moroni would describe their writing as “weak.” I concluded that this was due, in part, to comparing their work with the rich, complex, and beautiful writing in the Old Testament. In Part Two, we ask:

2) Were Nephi and Moroni actually weak in writing?

Read the rest of this entry »

Two Book of Mormon authors, Nephi and Moroni, lament what they see as a weakness in their writing. Those who have come to love the Book of Mormon usually dismiss this as false modesty. But what if we actually took them at their word?
Read the rest of this entry »

[The following post was submitted by Gregorio Billikopf, author of Isaiah Testifies of Christ, a website with excellent resources and downloadable commentary on Isaiah. We are hoping that Gregorio will be sending us several posts over the next few months, esp. to help us get through the Isaiah chapters of 2nd Nephi when we cover them in Sunday school! I know Gregorio's daughter, Cristina, from sitting in on Jim F.'s Levinas class, so she gets credit for bringing Gregorio's work to my attention.]

“And one shall say unto him, What are these wounds in thine hands? Then he shall answer, Those with which I was wounded in the house of my friends.” (Zech 13:6, KJV)

There has been an increasing attack upon the integrity of the Holy Scriptures: an attempt to weaken the faith of those who hold to its marvelous promises. Because the Lord knew that many scriptures would be corrupted, some of the most sublime Messianic scriptures are hidden amongst passages that were unlikely to be caught by those who tried to change them. Read the rest of this entry »

An interesting article—a joint venture by (non-LDS) Christian scholars Paul Owen and Mosser—appeared in FARMS several years ago, reviewing the book How Wide the Divide?. The article issues several challenges to LDS belief, but one that I think is particularly relevant for Sunday School is below. The gist of the challenge is,

“If the Bible contains a sufficient body of information for…the Christian gospel, then no more scripture is necessary. This would not in and of itself prove that the Bible cannot be added to…. [In] theory no conclusive reason exists why the canon must stay closed, …it is difficult to see how any new book could ever successfully be added to it.”

Read the rest of this entry »

It is time for a last post on Revelation, and I’ll dedicate it to what seems to me to be the most important–and most prevalent–theme in the entire Apocalypse: writing. Really, this means that I’ll be tracing two themes through the book: writing and Adam-ondi-Ahman. In the end, I think any “uniquely Mormon” reading of the Book of Revelation has to come to this in the end: it must give itself to this double theme in Revelation, to the place of writing in the text and how that weaves into the Apocalypse the role and purpose of the sort-of-future event that is Adam-ondi-Ahman. Read the rest of this entry »

Since my daughter is asleep in the room right behind me, I can’t really turn on any lights to consult commentaries this morning (I was planning on doing a bit of work on the book business of chapter 5). So instead I’ll take up the Moses/Elijah theme of chapter 11 and do a bit of reflecting on the place of Malachi in relation to the Apocalypse. Read the rest of this entry »

I was struck, as I worked through these posts the last few days, by the parallel between the mother-child scene in 1 Nephi 11 and the mother-child scene in Revelation 12. Now that I’ve got a few days to dwell on a few more specific parts of Revelation in a bit more detail, I want to begin there. Is there a connection between these two texts? Read the rest of this entry »